dtw1942 Posted March 11, 2013 Report Share Posted March 11, 2013 I came across this summary chart of average dick size studies on the PEGym forum. I found it very interesting: http://www.pegym.com/forums/gym/55858-excellent-average-size-chart.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RodEnuf Posted March 13, 2013 Report Share Posted March 13, 2013 I find the results from study 1 to be way out of whack. Studies 2 and 3 seem reasonable. I will be interested to see if anyone can track down the methodology of each of the three studies. Alan G g0nz0 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dtw1942 Posted March 13, 2013 Author Report Share Posted March 13, 2013 (edited) I believe this is the referenced study http://www.scribd.com/doc/103204754/Wessel It should be noted that the erect length measurement (12.89 cm) is none bone pressed and that the "usable" (bone pressed) erect length was determined by adding the average fat pad - 2.85 cm (1 1/8 inch) to the none bone pressed erect length. Since the average fat pad appears to be thicker (average age - 54) than what we normally see, this could account for the relative higher average BPEL. Edited March 13, 2013 by Guest Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RodEnuf Posted March 14, 2013 Report Share Posted March 14, 2013 Thanks for tracking that down. That may explain it all. That first study should be completely disregarded for bone pressed results. Alan G Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cocky8383 Posted March 27, 2013 Report Share Posted March 27, 2013 I prefer Chen's study for girth numbers lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wutty3 Posted January 8, 2014 Report Share Posted January 8, 2014 Does anyone have a free copy of the linked document (Wessel Study) above they'd be willing to share? PM Me please Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CenturyChild Posted January 8, 2014 Report Share Posted January 8, 2014 I don't have the full document, but the results table is online here - http://ethnicmuse.files.wordpress.com/2012/08/wessel.jpg Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wutty3 Posted January 8, 2014 Report Share Posted January 8, 2014 Thanks for that CC Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cavallogrosso Posted January 9, 2014 Report Share Posted January 9, 2014 But the third study is done for people with ED ( erectile disfunction) so the data is low that the real average. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuck45 Posted January 12, 2014 Report Share Posted January 12, 2014 (edited) Interesting on the chart it says wessels (1996) average 6.2 but in his published report it says 5.08 (12.9cm). The Journal of Urology, 0022-5347/96-0995 Vol 156, 995-997, September 1996 Copyright ©1996 by American Urological Association, Inc. Wessel used a study group of 80 men, pharmacological erection with self-stimulation. Edited January 12, 2014 by Guest Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CenturyChild Posted January 13, 2014 Report Share Posted January 13, 2014 6.2 was bone pressed (described as functional length in the study, and described as the length including the depth of the fat pad) 5.08 was excluding fat pad Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thk Posted March 13, 2015 Report Share Posted March 13, 2015 I have read more than once (online and we know online don't lie) lol, that when guys send in their own measurements the average is about 6.25 inches but when they are measured by the people doing the study the average is 5.25 inches. So who knows for sure....... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goldenboy Posted December 3, 2019 Report Share Posted December 3, 2019 On 1/9/2014 at 5:28 AM, cavallogrosso said: But the third study is done for people with ED ( erectile disfunction) so the data is low that the real average. Ding ding ding ding ding. We have a winner!!! Such is the case for an awful lot of the studies regarded as "reliable" on this site. Caleb LoShem 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuck45 Posted December 4, 2019 Report Share Posted December 4, 2019 Studies explained. ignore the evidence, go on anecdotes and beliefs. Members of the Flat Earth Society and other flat-Earthers claim that NASA and other government agencies conspire to delude the public into believing the Earth is spherical. Vinnig 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RodEnuf Posted December 4, 2019 Report Share Posted December 4, 2019 3 hours ago, goldenboy said: On 1/9/2014 at 5:28 AM, cavallogrosso said: But the third study is done for people with ED ( erectile dysfunction) so the data is low that the real average. Ding ding ding ding ding. We have a winner!!! Such is the case for an awful lot of the studies regarded as "reliable" on this site. If memory serves me, this was a study performed by a urologist and it started with every male patient he saw over a multi-month (perhaps 3-month, but I'm not sure) period. It was not limited to his ED patients. He injected each patient's penis with something like 'tri-mix' to induce an erection. He then excluded the small number of men who did not reach a firm erection. I believe this study was described in a post here many years ago. Alan G Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goldenboy Posted December 4, 2019 Report Share Posted December 4, 2019 2 hours ago, canuck45 said: Studies explained. ignore the evidence, go on anecdotes and beliefs. Members of the Flat Earth Society and other flat-Earthers claim that NASA and other government agencies conspire to delude the public into believing the Earth is spherical. Newsflash: I'm not the one cherrypicking studies to support a conspiratorial narrative. You are. rockslyde 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuck45 Posted December 4, 2019 Report Share Posted December 4, 2019 @goldenboy Exactly what a flat earther would say....the studies (by legitimate researchers ) are hand picked and wrong. Only we, the few hundred, know the truth, based on anecdotes and at best, shoddy pseudoscience. Reminds me of a story about some guy that was only 2nd chair calibre, it was obviously a conspiracy by the music teacher.....poor guy just couldn't accept he was less than perfect and that his beliefs in his greatness had nothing to do with reality; instead concocts some rationalization to explain his failure. Of course with his inestimable opinion of himself, anything that disagreed with his opinion was quite simple wrong. Not sure if that would be arrogance, ignorance or delusional. . BTW I think there is a bridge with your name on it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuck45 Posted December 4, 2019 Report Share Posted December 4, 2019 @RodEnuf Stop trying to confuse the issue with facts..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MicroButton Posted December 2, 2022 Report Share Posted December 2, 2022 On 3/11/2013 at 10:07 AM, dtw1942 said: I came across this summary chart of average dick size studies on the PEGym forum. I found it very interesting: http://www.pegym.com/forums/gym/55858-excellent-average-size-chart.html These guys are huge. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuck45 Posted December 2, 2022 Report Share Posted December 2, 2022 The chart seems to have disappeared. Chart from the American Urological Association. Original was in metric, I added markers and inches equivalent, along with my perhaps sarcastic comment. LOL With the statement of most fall withing 5.1-5.5 I used the middle of the range as "average" Caleb LoShem and rockslyde 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lukeow Posted December 7, 2022 Report Share Posted December 7, 2022 I keep seeing the above chart and I am sorry, but I really can not believe that my 15cm is erect penis would place me in the 90th percentile of men. As a teen, I compared with 4 others and I was shortest by far. All 4 others were over 6.2 inches. That wasn’t even bone pressed. I’m in the UK, so perhaps the average here is larger than the US? Who knows, but there is no way that only 10% of men have a longer penis than me. No way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuck45 Posted December 7, 2022 Report Share Posted December 7, 2022 (edited) UK Self measured. Brits 6.11-6.56 Kings College Research (2020) 5.16 No way! Yes way, unless there is some world wide conspiracy just to make guys in the 5" range feel better Edited December 7, 2022 by canuck45 Caleb LoShem 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Appreciater Posted December 7, 2022 Report Share Posted December 7, 2022 @canuck45 .... This chart always makes me think too hard.... So I added Inches marks on to it..😁 Caleb LoShem 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuck45 Posted December 7, 2022 Report Share Posted December 7, 2022 BTW my observations puts the average at 5.6 @Appreciater I did one with just a few markers on it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Appreciater Posted December 7, 2022 Report Share Posted December 7, 2022 @canuck45 ... 👍 ... Using the two, guys can see where they fall without conversation.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.