flipnyc Posted June 21, 2013 Report Posted June 21, 2013 Which would you rather have? Read on... Man with 140 lb. testicles unhappy with removal surgery after operation leaves him with 1 inch penis NYPost.com - June 21, 2013 - From The Sun A man with 140 lbs. testicles is unhappy after their removal - as the operation left him with a tiny penis. Wesley Warren Jr had a 13-hour procedure to remove his swollen sac after it grew so huge he had to wear a hoodie top as trousers to support the load. The 49-year-old couldn't have sex and suffered from crippling pain from carrying around the testicles - which weighed more than a baby hippo. But now the American fears he will never be able to have a relationship with a woman after the surgery left his manhood measuring just an inch long. Speaking exclusively to The Sun, Wesley said: "I know the majority of people are probably expecting me to express extreme happiness and glee that my life has been transformed since the sac has been removed - but it's not as simple as that." Read more at The Sun.
Jonny5 Posted June 21, 2013 Report Posted June 21, 2013 That's rough. I feel bad for him. That's definitely not a great outcome, but given the choice I'd take the 1 inch penis. The pain he lived in every day is gone. He has to be satisfied with that.
RodEnuf Posted June 21, 2013 Report Posted June 21, 2013 Except that according to a related article in the Las Vegas Review-Journal, "Warren, who's 6 feet tall, weighed more than 500 pounds before the operation, the surgeon said." That suggests that part of the explanation for his small penis issue is that most of it is probably buried in a fat pad. Also, the doctor said he suffers from high blood pressure and anemia. So his medications are likely affecting his ability to get a full erection. Alan G
Jonny5 Posted June 21, 2013 Report Posted June 21, 2013 (edited) Good points! I'm sure if he were to lose some weight and get his health in order, there may very well be some additional length. Still, the man had 140 pound testicles! I would gladly sacrifice the length of my penis to get rid of those things. I can only imagine the pain he lived with daily. Edited June 21, 2013 by Guest
wood650 Posted June 21, 2013 Report Posted June 21, 2013 Why would he and the doctors wait until his testicles were so large before removing them? I don't understand why they waited so long. I can't imagine the pain.
Rick Posted June 22, 2013 Report Posted June 22, 2013 Hey Wood! Not only that, but the full headline is pure crap (but ever-so-typical when one considers the sources). The operation did not cause the guy to be left with a 1-inch penis. Given his impossibly ridiculous 500-pound-plus weight, he already had a 1-inch penis. Instead, the operation caused him to be rid of 140 pounds worth of grossly enlarged testicles, thus giving him the ability to even see his 1-inch penis. So, post-op, the guy's complaining about not being able to have sex with a 1-inch penis,-- as if, pre-op, he had been able to have had sex while weighing 500+ pounds, along with having the accompanying 140 pounds of testicles banging around and blocking the way, and a 1-inch penis. :rolling: The guy in question is nuts, and whoever wrote this skewed articles is even nutser. Rick
Not really my name Posted June 22, 2013 Report Posted June 22, 2013 I don't know about his dimensions before the operation but the way the article was written left me with the impression he used to be longer. It does seem kind of weird he wants to sell his testicles on eBay though. Would be even more weird if someone were to buy them! I imagine you'd need some pretty big jars to keep those pickled.
toadfish327 Posted June 22, 2013 Report Posted June 22, 2013 If that were me, it would only leave about 15-20 lbs for the man. I Am glad Rick observed he started at 500 LB.
Pinkie B. Posted June 22, 2013 Report Posted June 22, 2013 that's good to hear. i read the sun article and kept thinking to myself that there's got to be a meaningful explanation. my guess when he said it "doesn't get any bigger" was that he just had 140lbs of scrotum removed and he can't possibly be healed enough in the crotch area to get a proper erection. i had surgery on my left breast when i was 18 to get a cancer taken off. when I came out of the operating room my breast was deformed and my nipples were lazy-eyed. the doctors didn't tell me anything to comfort me or assure me that i'd be normal again. it was really tough, but i healed. this guy will probably heal, too -- at least get better.
Pinkie B. Posted June 22, 2013 Report Posted June 22, 2013 "We had to make several different incisions at the same time to get to the testicles and penis without damaging them (their functionality)," he said, stressing that some of Warren's own skin was grafted from his body to cover his penis and testicles." yeah, this is what i was looking to read. the skin graft is tight at first and has to adjust to accept his normal body shape. that's what happened to me. it sounds like the doctors were really careful with him and were thinking about not just saving his life, but saving his quality of life, too. good doctors. hard to find.
Guest Posted June 23, 2013 Report Posted June 23, 2013 I'm pretty sure anyone who spends a couple of years withdrawn, depressed, and barely mobile under testicles heavier than my high school sweetheart would become morbidly obese. Depressed people often get fat. People with body shame often get fat (ask our members). And people in constant pain do not want to workout. I believe I read that he hadn't had surgery sooner because it was not covered by his insurance (he's on public assistance, I think I read) and he only had he surgery once a surgeon donated his time. I imagine he still has to pay many other costs, and will need to collect a pretty penny from his exclusive interviews and the auction of his sack. He probably remembers a longer penis from before he became so fat, and so unwell. He may also believe sympathy will drive up the price of the balls that ate his dick alive. That's totally how I'd sell it.
wood650 Posted June 25, 2013 Report Posted June 25, 2013 This story is tragic if the medical community made him suffer with this condition because he had no insurance. I can't imagine the pain he had. Why would they let him get in this horrible condition?
Fighting Blindly Posted June 26, 2013 Report Posted June 26, 2013 (edited) This story is tragic if the medical community made him suffer with this condition because he had no insurance. I can't imagine the pain he had. Why would they let him get in this horrible condition? Why do you are think one person is entitled to another person's time just because that other person has skills/knowledge the original person did not posses? Aka. Doctor vs patient. That exact thinking is what is killing America and freedom. Edited June 26, 2013 by Guest Removed Rule 2 violation. One's arguement isn't improved by name calling.
Fighting Blindly Posted June 26, 2013 Report Posted June 26, 2013 What if I had corn and wheat and you had none because you don't have the knowledge to farm. You didn't put in the work to grow it, but you NEED it. Does that mean my family goes without, just so you can survive? liberals love Darwin. Except when shit gets real
wood650 Posted June 26, 2013 Report Posted June 26, 2013 Wow. I would hope if I was a doctor and saw such need that I would do what I could to help.
Fighting Blindly Posted June 26, 2013 Report Posted June 26, 2013 My point remains my point. But sorry for cursing at u wood650; I'm a little drunk and people at work who voted for Obama were bitching about our insurance premium increases this year
Guest Posted June 26, 2013 Report Posted June 26, 2013 But it never ends. There are always more indigent patients in need. Almost every doctor I know has close to half a million dollars in debt. The one I knew who wasn't in debt, was old, and while he was comfortable, he wasn't rich. My best friend is still in med school, and she already owes over 300k, with 18 months to go. I can't imagine her, 35, still living with roommates, never taking vacations, struggling to make time for friends and family, tired, and willing to forego a day's pay every time someone suffering comes across her path.
wood650 Posted June 26, 2013 Report Posted June 26, 2013 What you say is true. There are times we can't help even if we have the skills. I would hope that I would have helped if I could. It is true that debt would be a good reason not to take such action.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now