Guest Posted June 2, 2019 Report Share Posted June 2, 2019 (edited) 3 hours ago, RodEnuf said: @LBaker: Expected by you, perhaps, but not by me. Erect penis lengths are constrained at zero for samples below the mean but have no such constraint above the mean. Thus the symmetry of a normal curve is most unlikely. I really think you have it backwards Alan. Measurements constrained by zero at the small end generally result in a skew the right, or large measurements. I actually have experience with this in industry. This data skews to the small. Edited June 2, 2019 by Guest Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted June 2, 2019 Report Share Posted June 2, 2019 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RodEnuf Posted June 2, 2019 Author Report Share Posted June 2, 2019 10 hours ago, LBaker said: Measurements constrained by zero at the small end generally result in a skew the right, or large measurements. I actually have experience with this in industry. This data skews to the small. So, you agree with me . . . Erect penis lengths are constrained at zero for samples below the mean but have no such constraint above the mean. Thus the symmetry of a normal curve is most unlikely. I never said that the curve was as expected. I only said that a genuine "normal" curve was not expected. I'm glad your industrial experience bears that out. Alan G Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pinkie B. Posted June 3, 2019 Report Share Posted June 3, 2019 Just eyeballing the graph of measured data it appears that it is slightly a positive skew as shown in the diagram. But, without doing an actual statistical test of the underlying distribution (something I know is a thing, but can't remember how to do myself because that's going back ten years in school), you can't say for sure. It's just guesstimating at that point. Does it really matter? It's a bell curve. Lopsided, but still bell-like. You can still learn from it, no? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted June 3, 2019 Report Share Posted June 3, 2019 (edited) 4 hours ago, RodEnuf said: I never said that the curve was as expected. I only said that a genuine "normal" curve was not expected. I'm glad your industrial experience bears that out. Yes, but experience bears out, and can be confirmed in relevant textbooks on the subject that a distribution constrained by zero on the left would expect to skew right not left. The penis distribution obviously skews left (as the mean is below mode and median). My statistics is relatively fresh in my mind. If the mean is below mode and median as the distribution clearly is, it skews toward the small. VERY UNUSUAL for a distribution constrained by zero. An explanation is needed, so I proposed one. If someone knows where the distribution Red mentioned with 20,000 measurements is, we could perhaps determine if this graph is just an anomaly or actually relevant. You could plug the bar heights into a statistical program, but they have already done that and mean is below mode and median. Edited June 3, 2019 by Guest Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Appreciater Posted July 5, 2022 Report Share Posted July 5, 2022 If you can figure cm.... This is much easier to follow..... Averagehardguy 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Averagehardguy Posted August 13, 2023 Report Share Posted August 13, 2023 The image is not visible, appreciater. Now back to the topic. I think I am average at least in my country. In most list the Netherlands come pretty high. Mine dick when fully errect is 6 inches long 5 in girth. For the Netherlands I think I am average. Maybe in other countries slightly above? zebraben and bellend07 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Appreciater Posted August 13, 2023 Report Share Posted August 13, 2023 (edited) @Averagehardguy .... (Strange.... after I posted the link , I tested it..and it worked 🤔) https://old-v2.calcsd.info/full.html Tried one more time...😁 Edited August 13, 2023 by Appreciater Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Appreciater Posted August 14, 2023 Report Share Posted August 14, 2023 @Appreciater .... I was confused as to which link.. 🙄. ... This is the one that has been changed to inches. This is pretty close... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnS1960 Posted August 14, 2023 Report Share Posted August 14, 2023 (edited) Found these in a couple of post by canuck45, a little clearer. Don't think the final comment on the bottom was part of the AUA Edited August 14, 2023 by JohnS1960 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnS1960 Posted August 14, 2023 Report Share Posted August 14, 2023 So when NOT self mesured, more people are under 5" than over 6"? NuderThanNude 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 14, 2023 Report Share Posted August 14, 2023 (edited) Yup. Exactly how the world of dicks look from the 4" position and explains how 4" look to the rest of the world. Interesting that NOBODY is really small when self reporting. Edited August 14, 2023 by wondering4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 14, 2023 Report Share Posted August 14, 2023 Nobody self reports being "qualified" for our "small" forum! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Averagehardguy Posted August 14, 2023 Report Share Posted August 14, 2023 Another thing, where can you get measured by a professional?? Maybe my stats would also change? NuderThanNude 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.