canuck45 Posted November 2, 2024 Report Posted November 2, 2024 from reddit... Grizz10231, Caleb LoShem, pinkybeta and 4 others 7
tomishere Posted November 2, 2024 Report Posted November 2, 2024 Make sense to me, I've dated men with all those sizes. smalloneatl6 and Grizz10231 2
Appreciater Posted November 2, 2024 Report Posted November 2, 2024 (edited) .... I've seen this chart before, and to me it seems more realistic and reasonable than most.... particularly the Average range. I would have added one more.... Any above the 10.3" ..as Drastically Huge. Edited November 2, 2024 by Appreciater Grizz10231 1
Jerry1 Posted November 2, 2024 Report Posted November 2, 2024 the average and enormous ranges seem to great and it only shows length, which brings it back to volume as the best indicator. Grizz10231 1
Albacore Posted November 3, 2024 Report Posted November 3, 2024 (edited) Think it should be a broader range of sizes about every 1.5" inch, to have more of a controlled standard deviation of sizes. So like: micro 0"-1.5" tiny 1.6"-3.1" small 3.2"-4.7" average 4.8"-6.3" big 6.4"-7.9" huge 8"-9.5" massive 9.6"-11.1" gargantuan 11.2"-12.7" Edited November 3, 2024 by Albacore Grizz10231, rockslyde, Foursquared and 4 others 7
pokerpro831 Posted November 3, 2024 Report Posted November 3, 2024 The difference between 4.8 and 6.3 is pretty massive. smalloneatl6, TomAustin, Grizz10231 and 1 other 3 1
Pumpkin Eater Posted November 3, 2024 Report Posted November 3, 2024 (edited) 27 minutes ago, pokerpro831 said: The difference between 4.8 and 6.3 is pretty massive. Yes. 1.5 constant steps don't take into account varying percent in each step. Reddit seems best. Edited November 3, 2024 by Pumpkin Eater Grizz10231 1
Guest Posted November 3, 2024 Report Posted November 3, 2024 It’s nice to see I’m in the small range .
TEEBENZAR Posted November 3, 2024 Report Posted November 3, 2024 What it doesn't account for is growers and show'ers? I'm in the 'micro' range soft, but 'small' when erect. smalloneatl6, Foursquared and Grizz10231 3
new2day Posted November 3, 2024 Report Posted November 3, 2024 I'm in the average range, which is where I've always considered myself to be. It's also just about length, and doesn't consider girth, so volume doesn't figure. I'm average length, but above average girth. It does appear to be a more reasonable assessment of size. Grizz10231 1
Littleken Posted November 4, 2024 Report Posted November 4, 2024 I'm still small no matter what chart. 4.3" so I'm small(I knew that) Grizz10231 and Foursquared 2
horsenotbenamed Posted November 4, 2024 Report Posted November 4, 2024 On 11/2/2024 at 2:13 PM, canuck45 said: from reddit... It looks like the micro and enormous ranges are much wider than the middle ones. Still pretty accurate. Grizz10231 1
pinkybeta Posted November 4, 2024 Report Posted November 4, 2024 I'm tiny. I suppose I knew that. It's been the considered opinion of previous gfs Grizz10231, Kurzer86 and Foursquared 3
RodEnuf Posted November 4, 2024 Report Posted November 4, 2024 13 hours ago, TEEBENZAR said: What it doesn't account for is growers and show'ers? I'm in the 'micro' range soft, but 'small' when erect. Read it as two separate charts, one for erect length categories and the other for flaccid length categories. There's no expectation that a guy will necessarily have an erect length in the same category as his flaccid length. 6INCHES66, smalloneatl6 and Grizz10231 3
Daniel Jones Posted November 4, 2024 Report Posted November 4, 2024 Okay so between small and average ain't bad Grizz10231 1
TomAustin Posted November 4, 2024 Report Posted November 4, 2024 So I am micro or tiny depending on the day. Grizz10231 and Foursquared 2
smallgrower Posted November 4, 2024 Report Posted November 4, 2024 Agree with @RodEnuf that it should be read as two different charts. I fall into the micro when soft but average when hard. Grizz10231, toadfish327 and Foursquared 3
canuck45 Posted November 4, 2024 Author Report Posted November 4, 2024 The steps and range vary a lot. Jastryd, rockslyde, Grizz10231 and 1 other 4
scottysmall67 Posted November 5, 2024 Report Posted November 5, 2024 Looks like fun. I've always considered myself borderline micro so not surprised to see my size at the top of the micro range. I think it's a bit odd that the small category goes straight to average when there is an above average interval between average and large. Perhaps small to small average to large average to large or some similar naming that doesn't upset sensitive souls who think they are average and would be offended at the low average descriptor. grandstand, Smallold1, Grizz10231 and 1 other 4
pokerpro831 Posted November 5, 2024 Report Posted November 5, 2024 On 11/4/2024 at 9:43 AM, smallgrower said: Agree with @RodEnuf that it should be read as two different charts. I fall into the micro when soft but average when hard. The average person doesn't talk about flaccid size IMO. Grizz10231 and canuck45 2
Kurzer86 Posted November 5, 2024 Report Posted November 5, 2024 Tiny and Happy about Grizz10231 and Foursquared 2
Appreciater Posted November 5, 2024 Report Posted November 5, 2024 @pokerpro831 ..... It is mainly the hub-bub of the end result, rather than the starting point for most, I think. Grizz10231 1
Smallold1 Posted November 9, 2024 Report Posted November 9, 2024 On 11/5/2024 at 5:05 PM, scottysmall67 said: Looks like fun. I've always considered myself borderline micro so not surprised to see my size at the top of the micro range. I think it's a bit odd that the small category goes straight to average when there is an above average interval between average and large. Perhaps small to small average to large average to large or some similar naming that doesn't upset sensitive souls who think they are average and would be offended at the low average descriptor. It’s yet another chart that tells me my English dick is a micro at 1.25” soft and 3”hard . I also have tiny testicles I wonder if there are any men similar to me Foursquared and Grizz10231 2
teevee Posted November 9, 2024 Report Posted November 9, 2024 Micro soft and tiny hard... seems about right Foursquared and Grizz10231 2
Guest Posted November 14, 2024 Report Posted November 14, 2024 @pokerpro831 I agree . Flaccid size can vary so much .
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now