Jump to content
News Ticker
  • Please read the post "Logging in with Email Address" in the Software Announcements forum.
  • Announcement

    Recommended Posts

    Posted (edited)

    I created a spread sheet years ago, based on my estimates, and have kept it updated.
    The vertical line is inches or centimetres
    Horizontal line is partner # (all names are kept anonymous LOL).
     

    Capture.JPG

    Capture2.JPG

    Edited by canuck45
    • 2 months later...
    Posted

    Yeah, I guess either the "small" aren't very active in the gay world, much like they aren't very active in the straight world.  Or, maybe they are just rare.  Or suffer discrimination.

    Posted (edited)

    An alternate spin:
    <5    10
    <6    38
    6-7    21
    7+    6

    ON my experience only (75 partners)
    More < 5” than greater than 7”, so I wouldn’t say smaller don’t participate.
    6" or less outnumbers over 6" by almost 2 to 1
     

    Capture.JPG

    Edited by canuck45
    Posted

    If 5" is about average it would be no surprise that there are more less than 5" than greater than 7".  7" is quite rare while around 50% of men are around 5 or less.

    Posted

    Wow I am so impressed with this. I will now spend the day thinking of the reaction I would have got if I had asked to measure the boobs of every woman I have had an encounter with and explained it was for my size comparison chart. Well done. 

    Posted
    1 minute ago, lloydbaker said:

    If 5" is about average it would be no surprise that there are more less than 5" than greater than 7".  7" is quite rare while around 50% of men are around 5 or less.

    So then why say less than 5" (small) are inactive. 
    <5        13.33%
    <6        50.67%
    6-7        28.00%
    7+        8.00%
     

    Posted (edited)
    11 minutes ago, canuck45 said:

    So then why say less than 5" (small) are inactive. 
    <5        13.33%
    <6        50.67%
    6-7        28.00%
    7+        8.00%

    I'm referring to actually small, say, less than 4.5 or 4.   Guys around 5" aren't small.  They are typical.  Tiny Jock was thinking that way, too, I think.

    I know, I know.  Outside the "smaller forum", average is considered small.  We consider average big.

     

    Edited by Guest
    Posted (edited)
    On 8/3/2020 at 3:52 PM, canuck45 said:

    I created a spread sheet years ago, based on my estimates, and have kept it updated.
    The vertical line is inches or centimetres
    Horizontal line is partner # (all names are kept anonymous LOL).
     

    Capture.JPG

    Capture2.JPG

    A good post, this is far more realistic than the compare yourself to average study.

    Edited by RAized

    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

    Guest
    Reply to this topic...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    ×
    ×
    • Create New...

    Important Information

    By using this site, you agree to our Guidelines.